Chris Martenson: The Vaccine Safety Data You Need

Peak Prosperity, Released on 5/18/21

You know, it doesn’t have to be this way. To combat vaccine skepticism, or hesitancy, I have a simple solution for the authorities; stop spinning the data and start being transparent and consistent. It’s really not that hard to grasp. People don’t like uncertainty and that is often a function of authorities being unclear or inconsistent. The bottom line is that the short-term safety data for the 3 major vaccines shows that while they may be far preferable to getting Covid, they are among the least safe vaccines ever produced. Informed people would almost certainly elect to receive the vaccines nonetheless, but they absolutely need the data. We deliver it, you make your own decisions.


CDC on who shouldn’t get the shot?…

LA Times…

Types of vaccines…

CDC post-vaccine cycle thresholds less than or equal to 28…

Christopher Martenson is a former American biochemical scientist. Currently he is a writer and trend forecaster interested in macro trends regarding the economy, energy composition and environment. He is the founder of As one of the early econobloggers who forecasted the housing market collapse and stock market correction years in advance, Chris rose to prominence with the launch of his seminal video seminar which later became a book called The Crash Course. Chris’ latest book (co-authored with Adam Taggart) is called Prosper!: How to Prepare for the Future and Create a World Worth Inheriting.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

the key phrase here is ‘the short-term data” Yes, that is ALL that we have about ALL the COVID vaccines (which are not at all traditional vaccines). The FDA chose to allow these COVID “vaccines” to be released on an “emergency basis” after about 6 months of testing. However, the shortest time period you test a vaccine for is 4 years, that way you have some idea about both the efficacy and side-effects. Without the long-term phase 3 trials — which have always been required prior to release of a vaccine — it is a crap-shoot at best. See this video by a Canadian viral immunologist for a really good explanation


The globalists see the optimum human population to be around 500 million. Consider what Bill Gates et al did in Africa with a tetanus vaccine — it was targeted at women of childbearing age and it made them sterile. This is what Robert Kennedy wrote about the Gates Foundation on Instagram (the post was scrubbed and Kennedy was banned):

In 2010, Gates committed $ 10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign.

Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.

After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. (see )


On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies. This was, of course, not reported in mainstream/corporate news, see 

also for the text of the petition, see

Their concerns were directed in particular to the following points:

  • —The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
  • —The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
  • —The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
  • —The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

This all makes me think of the news scene from the science fiction movie, “I am Legend”, where the doctor announces that the new viral vaccine has just “cured cancer”. Three years later . . .